圈圈学论文(二)区间灰数案例应用
分享兴趣,传播快乐,
增长见闻,留下美好!
亲爱的您,这里是LearningYard学苑。
前面小编已经对灰数概念及相关其运算做了详细的讲解,忘记了的同学赶紧复习一下.
本节将通过一个实例来显示所提出的区间灰数方法的使用,这可以被视为EGN的一个特例。为了证明所提出的方法具有区间灰数,考虑投资决策公司的评估问题。
案例:一家投资银行计划投资三家公司,编号为a1,a2,a3。考虑三个标准:c1,年度产品收入;c2,社会效益;c3,环境污染程度。标准的权重向量表示为W=(0.1,0.2,0.7)。所有三家公司都有三种可能的状态:良好,θ1;普通,θ2;较差,θ3。每个状态的概率表示为区间概率,其中P1=[0.3,0.5],P2=[0.4,0.9.P3=[0.1,0.5]。各方案的标准值采用区间灰数形式,灰色随机变量服从正态分布。
下表列出了相关的评估值。可以根据提供的信息选择最佳替代方案。以下程序产生最理想的替代方案。
★ 步骤1:规范化决策矩阵。
在所给案例中,c1和c2为极大型指标,而c3为极小型指标。应用以下两个等式产生归一化决策矩阵。
得到规范化矩阵如下表所示:
★步骤2:确定理想点
将以下公式应用于规范化矩阵中所示数据,得出绝对理想点I:
★步骤3:计算与标准相关的效用值和后悔值
计算与标准相关的效用值和后悔值需要考虑两个参数,即风险厌恶系数和后悔厌恶系数。此文中,风险规避系数取值为0.88。假设后悔厌恶系数为0.3。与标准相关的效用值和后悔值可使用上期推文中相关等式确定。
★ 步骤4:计算备选方案的总体感知效用值
通过应用以下公式:
可将上述计算的效用值和后悔值相加,以获得备选方案的感知效用值,如下表所示:
下表为计算的整体感知效用值:
★步骤5:根据总体感知效用间隔对备选方案进行优先级排序
首先,确定总体感知效用区间的正理想解和负理想解:
接下来,计算每个总体感知效用区间与正理想解和负理想解之间的距离。
最后,获得相对接近度:
可以看出C3>C2>C1,因此,确定最佳替代方案为3。下表显示了使用不同值的相对接近度和排名结果。当使用不同的值时,排名结果保持不变。然而,在某些情况下,排名结果可能会随着参数的变化而变化。
★英文学习
The previous small editor has made a detailed explanation of the concept of gray number and related operations, forgotten students hastened to review, portal:
This section will show the use of the proposed interval grays method through an example, which can be considered a special case of EGNs. In order to prove that the proposed method has the interval gray number, consider the evaluation of investment decision-making companies.
Case: An investment bank plans to invest in three companies under the numbers a1, a2, a3. Consider three criteria: c1, annual product income; The standard weight vector is represented as W -(0.1,0.2,0.7). All three companies have three possible states: Good, 1; Normal, s2; The probability of each state is expressed as the probability of the interval, where P1 is 0.3, 0.5, P2 is 0.4, 0.9.P3, and 0.1, 0.5. The standard values of each scheme are in the form of interval gray numbers, and the gray random variables obey the normal distribution.
The following table lists the relevant evaluation values. The best alternative can be selected based on the information provided. The following procedure produces the ideal alternative.
Step 1: Normalize the decision matrix. In the given case, c1 and c2 are very large indicators, while c3 is very small indicators. The following two equations are applied to produce a normalized decision matrix
The normalized matrix is shown in the following table:
Step 2: Determine the ideal point. Apply the following formula to the data shown in the normalization matrix to arrive at the absolute ideal point I:
Step 3: Calculate the utility and regret values associated with the standard.
Calculating the utility and regret values associated with the standard requires two parameters, namely, the risk aversion factor and the regret aversion factor. In this paper, the risk aversion coefficient is valued at 0.88. Suppose the regret aversion factor is 0.3. The utility and regret values associated with the standard can be determined using the relevant equation in the previous tweet.
Step 4: Calculate the overall perceived utility value of the alternative. By applying the following formula:
The utility and regret values of the above calculations can be added together to obtain the perceived utility values for the alternative, as shown in the following table:
The following table is the calculated overall perceived utility value:
Step 5: Prioritize alternatives based on overall perceived utility intervals. First, determine the positive and negative ideal solutions for the overall perceived utility interval:
Next, calculate the distance between each overall perceived utility interval and the positive and negative ideal solutions.
Finally, get a relative closeness:
As can be seen> C3 > C1, therefore, the best alternative is determined to be 3.
The following table shows the relative proximity and ranking results of using different values. When different values are used, the ranking result remains the same. However, in some cases, ranking results may vary with parameters.
英文翻译:谷歌翻译
参考资料:
[1]Zhou H , Wang J Q , Zhang H Y . Grey stochastic multi-criteria decision making based on regret theory and TOPSIS[J]. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2015, 8(2):1-14.
本文由LearningYard学苑原创,如有侵权请联系删除。
海上繁花3740集预告雷宇峥追妻火葬场,杜晓苏给他试用期窦骁李沁主演的海上繁花第3740集预告思琦安慰晓苏。朋友们劝说雷宇峥要去主动追求杜晓苏,可是杜晓苏却说她俩或许只适合做朋友。雷宇峥开启追妻火葬场节奏,死乞白赖为自己争得了十天试用期
海上繁花第3334集预告雷宇峥与何群飞去林向远老家暗访窦骁李沁主演的海上繁花第3334集预告邹思琦认为许小姐威胁到了杜晓苏跟雷宇峥的感情,就苦口婆心劝说。雷宇峥对此不置可否,杜晓苏想顺其自然,不去过问。雷宇峥跟何群飞一起去林向远老家调
全职主妇程莉莎强势回归做艺人想红是人之常情01hr在演艺圈里,很长一段时间,程莉莎因被打上郭晓冬妻子的标签而失去自我。其实在嫁给郭晓冬之前,程莉莎也是一名颇具潜力的新生代演员。程莉莎出生于武汉的一个富贵之家,从小她就是倍受
曾让金庸拉黑的电影鬼才新艺城七怪徐克篇有着香港斯皮尔伯格美誉的名导徐克,是新浪潮运动新武侠电影时代的领跑者,代表着90年代香港电影发展的一个高峰。在徐克编导的影片中,充满了奔放自由的想象力与大胆创新的特质,可以说他把猎
绝美人间传奇!两个大美人还在一起娱乐圈每出一个渣男,吃瓜群众们就对爱情多怀疑一分。而绝美传奇爱情还是存在的柏原崇和内田有纪还在一起!!!还有人不知道他俩是一对吗?眼睛能让人怀孕的内田有纪姐姐,和全亚洲少女都为之倾
姐学,一个网络传奇爱情故事刘心悠和姐学又双叒叕火了。豆瓣有个小组(为了避免不必要的麻烦就不露出该组名字了),是姬圈姐妹们交流感情生活和心得的小小根据地。2012年该组出现了一个帖子,原标题为和一个算是三线女
挤痘出轨后,陈翔资源受影响了吗?几年前陈翔和毛晓彤相恋时,双方在路人眼里都是十八线。但选秀出身的陈翔有战斗粉,可能粉丝和陈翔都有点幻觉。从分手后到现在,毛晓彤一部部演戏还有了三十而已,早已不是当年的瑛贵人,陈翔业
杨幂的演技拖累这部电影了吗?刺杀小说家可能是本档期评价最两极的电影,喜欢的会非常喜欢,讨厌的会非常讨厌。所以还没买票在犹豫的朋友可以这样想,看下基本设定自己能不能进去。有一部小说,小说里反派的命运能牵动一个有
殷桃背后是不是有资源呢?在娱乐圈这么受欢迎,实际上并不是这样当我说到殷桃这个演员的时候,也许有不少的人觉得很熟悉。也许是在武则天秘史鸡毛飞上天正青春看到过殷桃的表演,并对她有所印象。殷桃,实际上是出身于解放军艺校的,从事的主要是话剧表演,不
梅根夫妇意图让人心寒专家警告,梅根夫妇想毁灭英女王的传奇如果说谁是英国王室的最大搅局者,那么非梅根马克尔莫属。梅根马克尔(英文名MeghanMarkle),全名蕾切尔梅根马克尔,1981年8月4日出生于美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶,演员。梅根
利路修一路佛系成顶流,淘汰后热度不减,出席高端晚宴资源羡煞人利路修真的火了,不但在中国国内收获一大堆笋丝,热度竟然波及了多个大洲。最近他相继登上俄罗斯澳大利亚英国美国等国的新闻,就连印尼都逃不出利路修的魔掌,5月26日的印尼时报(IDNTi